Every decision an agent produces via DAMM leaves an immutable trail: what was decided, with which scores, under which human oversight and with which transparency disclosure. An audit trail designed for the EU AI Act.
The DAMM registry is designed around the articles that concern the traceability of automated decisions.
Every verdict produced via API/agents creates an immutable registry entry: input summary, scores, verdict, model and timestamp. An append-only trail designed for log record-keeping.
Each entry can be reviewed by a person who records the outcome — acknowledged, overridden or rejected — with a decision and notes. Human oversight becomes documented, not implicit.
The registry records when the AI-generated disclosure (Art. 50) was served to the caller, with the exact text and time. Transparency toward the user becomes verifiable after the fact.
An agent or app asks DAMM to analyze a decision via the API. The engine produces scores across the 4 pillars, a Health Score and a verdict.
At the verdict, DAMM records a write-once snapshot — denormalized, so the trail survives even if the decision is deleted. No one can rewrite the scores after the fact.
From the dashboard a human records oversight (Art. 14), while the served disclosure (Art. 50) is tracked automatically. The whole registry is exportable to CSV for an audit.
{
"decisionId": "3f7c1a2b-…",
"source": "api_complete",
"healthScore": 70,
"model": "deepseek-chat",
"verdictSummary": "…",
"disclosureServed": true, // Art. 50
"oversightStatus": "pending", // Art. 14
"createdAt": "2026-08-01T10:05:00Z"
}Here is how a single recorded decision looks: immutable verdict, Art. 50 disclosure and Art. 14 oversight in the same row.
Decision ID: 3f7c1a2b-8e4d-… · api_complete · deepseek-chat
Proceed with caution: authorize a partial refund and check the customer history before the full settlement.
Illustrative sample data.
It is a structured, immutable archive that stores, for each decision produced by an AI system, what was decided, with which scores, which model and when — together with the human oversight and the transparency disclosure. It makes automated decisions traceable and auditable.
It contributes to three EU AI Act requirements (Reg. EU 2024/1689): record-keeping (Art. 12), human oversight (Art. 14) and transparency toward users (Art. 50). It does not guarantee conformity, but provides the documentary trail these articles require.
Only decisions produced via API/agents (complete and conversational modes). Test decisions (sandbox API keys) are not recorded, because they do not produce a real verdict and are not compliance-relevant.
Yes. The verdict snapshot is write-once: scores, Health Score and summary cannot be rewritten after creation. Only the human-oversight fields are updatable, as intended by the Art. 14 oversight principle.
Yes. From the developer dashboard you can filter the entries and export them to CSV, ready to share with auditors or consultants. The registry is also queryable via a read-only API.
No. The registry is a technical traceability and compliance-support tool. It does not constitute legal advice and does not replace a conformity assessment or the role of a DPO.
The registry populates itself from the API layer. You focus on oversight; DAMM keeps the trail.
This page is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. The AI decision registry is a traceability tool that supports compliance with the EU AI Act (Reg. EU 2024/1689); it does not guarantee conformity and does not replace a conformity assessment or the role of a DPO.